Love is never a relationship; love is relating. It is always a river, flowing, unending. Love knows no full stop; the honeymoon begins but never ends. It is not like a novel that starts at a certain point and ends at a certain point. It is an ongoing phenomenon. Lovers end, love continues– it is a continuum. It is a verb, not a noun.
And why do we reduce the beauty of relating to relationship? Why are we in such a hurry? Because to relate is insecure, and relationship is a security. Relationship has a certainty; relating is just a meeting of two strangers, maybe just an overnight stay and in the morning we say goodbye. Who knows what is going to happen tomorrow? And we are so afraid that we want to make it certain, we want to make it predictable. We would like tomorrow to be according to our ideas; we don't allow it freedom to have its own say. So we immediately reduce every verb to a noun.
In a better world, with more meditative people, with a little more enlightenment spread over the earth, people will love, love immensely, but their love will remain a relating not a relationship. And I am not saying that their love will be only momentary. There is every possibility their love may go deeper than your love, may have a higher quality of intimacy, may have something more of poetry and more of godliness in it. And there is every possibility their love may last longer than your so-called relationship ever lasts. But it will not be guaranteed by the law, by the court, by the policeman. The guarantee will be inner. It will be a commitment from the heart, it will be a silent communion.
If you enjoy being with somebody, you would like to enjoy it more and more. If you enjoy the intimacy, you would like to explore the intimacy more and more. And there are a few flowers of love which bloom only after long intimacies. There are seasonal flowers too; within six weeks they are there, in the sun, but within six weeks again they are gone forever. There are flowers that take years to come, and there are flowers that take many years to come. The longer it takes, the deeper it goes. But it has to be a commitment from one heart to another heart. It has not even to be verbalized, because to verbalize it is to profane it. It has to be a silent commitment; eye to eye, heart to heart, being to being. It has to be understood, not said.
Forget relationships and learn how to relate.
Once you are in a relationship you start taking each other for granted– that's what destroys all love affairs. The woman thinks she knows the man, the man thinks he knows the woman. Nobody knows either! It is impossible to know the other, the other remains a mystery. And to take the other for granted is insulting, disrespectful.
There is a difference between a thing and a person. The furniture in the room is the same, but the man and the woman, they are no more the same. Explore again, start again. That's what I mean by relating.
Relating means you are always starting, you are continuously trying to become acquainted. Again and again, you are introducing yourself to each other. You are trying to see the many facets of the other's personality. You are trying to penetrate deeper and deeper into his realm of inner feelings, into the deep recesses of his being. You are trying to unravel a mystery which cannot be unraveled. That is the joy of love: the exploration of consciousness.
And if you relate, and don't reduce it to a relationship, then the other will become a mirror to you. Exploring him, unawares you will be exploring yourself too. Getting deeper into the other, knowing his feelings, his thoughts, his deeper stirrings, you will be knowing your own deeper stirrings too. Lovers become mirrors to each other, and then love becomes a meditation. Relationship is ugly, relating is beautiful.
Hence I say relate. By saying relate, I mean remain continuously on a honeymoon. Go on searching and seeking each other, finding new ways of loving each other, finding new ways of being with each other. And each person is such an infinite mystery, inexhaustible, unfathomable, that it is not possible that you can ever say, "I have known her," or, "I have known him." At the most you can say, "I have tried my best, but the mystery remains a mystery."
In fact the more you know, the more mysterious the other becomes. Then love is a constant adventure. "
Monday, August 30, 2010
My favorite Osho piece.
I reproduce below the thoughts of Osho which I feel strongly about..............
LOVE IS NOT A RELATIONSHIP. Love relates, but it is not a relationship. A relationship is something finished. A relationship is a noun; the full stop has come, the honeymoon is over. Now there is no joy, no enthusiasm, now all is finished. You can carry it on, just to keep your promises. You can carry it on because it is comfortable, convenient, cozy. You can carry it on because there is nothing else to do. You can carry it on because if you disrupt it, it is going to create much trouble for you… Relationship means something complete, finished, closed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

4 comments:
Its totally you as I have known you. Very few people in this world can have such gelling of thoughts and actions.It is such a pleasure being your friend.You know Sunshine you spread light and happiness where ever you go. And that infectious laughter!
Be what you are always!!!!
Indeed it is a very nice piece by Osho. It is well known that Osho is a wizard with words. In criticism he is acerbic. Osho tries to fathom and convey an experience through words, which always have had inherent limitation.
Relationship has a boundary whereas Love is boundless. How can one put the boundless in bound? As long as one is experiencing relationship & love, nomenclature is irrelevant. Also as connect between two persons gets stronger and deeper, the boundedness of relationship starts getting diluted and the connect begins to expand. For some lucky ones, the boundary might completely dissolve!
Equally true is the fact that in the given social milieu, and for a vast majority of mortals, relationship has to be there as only through it begins the flow of relating, since the former is concrete and identifiable and the latter abstract. However the fundamental issue is the understanding dawning upon the person about the utility of relating and futility of relationship and vice versa. In reality, the utility of relationship in the proper understanding & evolvement of relating between two persons cannot be, and should not be, overlooked, which Osho possibly has done. If relationship is limiting, relating can be too fleeting.
Another facet is that it is never a fixed position. Human mind is such that it always gets drawn to experimenting beyond what is available. Consider a society where there is no fixed relationship and just relating humanely exists. There, human mind would sure like to experience boundedness of relationship. Therefore, it is like a sea-saw swing trying to find a perfect balance, and when that happens neither relationship nor relating remains of any import for the person.
I found ur posts very good in quality of prose and also thought. But you post so rarely that your brag to be an avid blogger does not stick.
manoj pandey
Guilty as charged but I have every intention to rectify it and become more regular since I have freed my mind from office and this is really very conducive to quality thought :-)
Post a Comment